Tag Archives: Robert Parkinson

你在哪你会吸引谁?

“逃离北上广”、“二三线城市成为新舞台”、“逃回北上广”等等都是近年来热烈讨论的话题。而在经过了几年盲目相信“逃离北上广”是正确的抉择到又“逃回北上广”之后,最新的调查显示出如今人们已经开始从城市环境和自身发展出发,更加冷静和理性地判断、选择、决定适合自己发展的地域。第二期中国人才流动调查-2013(China Talents-Flow Survey)是由罗迈国际在2013年12月正式发布的,并有将近4000调查者参与的一份关于中国人才的流动方式及趋势的报告,其结果恰好揭示了不同类型人才对地域的深度考虑,同时也为企业在不同地区选择人才、吸引人才提供了参考。 通过罗迈国际第二季《中国人才流动调查-2013》来看,总体虽然有35%的精英人士毅然选择了留在一线城市(北京,上海,广州),但是选择任何城市和考虑二线城市的比例也都有明显上升的趋势,53%的人会考虑和选择二三线城市或者三四线城市,这不能不说与中国中小型城市的经济发展息息相关。尤其是考虑二线城市的比例相比上一季调查骤然升高了16%,这意味着前几年在二线城市投资的雇主将迎来非常丰厚的“人才红利”。通过对人才的性别、年龄和教育背景的分析,我们也发现了其中相当有趣的规律。针对这些规律,雇主们也可通过适当变换目标和策略,就可在适宜的地区招聘到性价比颇高的雇员。

20131230_MA_HR_13_01

  性别 从男女性的角度分析,选择一线城市的女性比男性高出10%。一方面,女性对生活舒适性的期许普遍高于男性,且集中在一线城市的产业普遍具有低体力强度、低危险度和低污染度的特点,显然也更适合女性的发展以及女性同男性的平等竞争,而男性对这三种情况的耐受度无论从生理角度还是心理角度都更好,受限制较小。所以男性选择去任何城市工作和选择去一线城市工作的比例都是 32%。另一方面,中国社会对女性家庭角色的定位仍然不是全全的工作女性,对女性在培养孩子、照顾老人的责任要求高于男性,这也限制了部分女性单纯从事业发展进行地域选择的可能性。但近10年来二线城市的崛起和女性自身意识的发展另知识女性们更愿意凭借自己的智慧、才华、能力与男子公平竞争。城这也是为何在二线城市的选择上男女不分伯仲。

20131230_MA_HR_13_02

  年龄 随着年龄的不同,工作地域的选择性对不同的年龄段的职业发展也大不相同。只愿意去往一线城市工作的比例随着年龄的增长而下降,也就是说,越年轻越愿意在一线城市拼一拼。虽然作为一线城市生活成本主力的房子价格是越来越高,但新毕业学生普遍对住宿的要求不高,在吃穿交通上也不介意维持在较低标准,而且更愿意通过更努力的工作、承担更大的压力获得美好的未来,而随着年龄增长,婚姻、医疗、教育等开销逐步上升,一线城市的高成本全方位显示出来,这是促使一部分人在30岁左右转向其他城市的原因。愿意去任何城市工作的比例从18到35岁间有小幅度的波动,在45岁之后呈现急速上升的趋势。这一方面是因为人在45岁之后的家庭羁绊减少,可以更自由地根据自己的事业及喜好选择,另一方面,也是由于目前大多数职位会倾向于招聘45岁以下的人才,为了扩大就业机会,人们在地域选择上做出了让步。但,需要提醒的是,45岁其实仍然至少有非常黄金的10年职业生涯,而且经验和阅历达到了一个非常成熟的境界,事实上是企业非常好的选择。

20131230_MA_HR_13_03

  教育背景 从罗迈国际《第二期中国人才流动调查-2013》的调查结果我们可以很容易地发现,随着学历的增高,选择仅一线城市的比例也在升高,而随着学历的下降,选择任何城市的人才比例则基本是升高的状态。其中博士生选择一线城市的人才高达50%,高出本科生20个百分比,而本科生中有近三分之一不介意任何城市,该选项在博士和MBA中只有3、4个点数。由此可见一线城市对于高学历人才的吸引力还是非常显著的,但高学历并不等于高能力、高生产力,所以其他城市的雇主也无需因此而过于耿耿于怀。

20131230_MA_HR_13_04

  留住人才VS. 吸引人才 综上所述,我们可以很清晰地看到不同地域对不同人才的吸引力。一线城市一方面拥有大量新鲜生力军,可以让雇主从源头选择更优秀的人才来培养,另一方面聚集了更多高端人才,雇主在高层职位上可有更多选择。同时要注意的是,若想稳定潜力股、吸引蓝筹股,生活成本和环境污染是头号问题,对此我们认为一是要重金聘高才:一些公司已经加薪加福利,例如华为2014年新招应届生起薪也将有大幅上调:“一线城市本科毕业生的税前起薪将从以往的6500元上调至9000元以上,硕士毕业生将从8000元上调至10000元以上。二是改进环境污染:企业内部应为员工们安装空气净化机,甚至写字楼也该设有净化空气的设备。还有增加体检项目、发放相应保健品等都可以起到很好的保留人才效果。 二三线城市的雇主其实在30~55岁的人才方面有更好的选择权,尤其是 30~45岁人才中不乏经验丰富而且吃苦耐劳的典范,把他们从一线城市的巨大压力下吸引过来正是二线城市的优势;45~55岁的人才大多已经有较好的人脉及资源积累,从这个方面选择人才会另雇主受益不少。另外在高学历人才方面,男性是更为容易和稳定的选择,帮助其安家是非常实际有效的措施。 无论是大城市还是小城市,人们都性该谨慎选择发展的地方。一线城市还是其他城市都有各自的优点和局限性,例如经济发展,生活环境和工作机会。人们只有找到最合适自己的,才能工作和生活的更幸福;而政府和企业方面,也应当提供更多的发展机会,重视营造良好的生活、工作环境。不管是“逃离北上广”,还是“坚守北上广”,都有助于城市间的人才流动,对于合理公平的竞争和发展,人才流动都有利于人才合理的分布。 Read the original version at:http://www.ceconline.com/hr/ma/8800069327/01/?cf=bm  

Making Sense of The Challenge of A Big Move

Recruitment | Robert Parkinson  

USA

China is the world’s second-largest economy with growth that would leave many countries salivating. In my view China is a fantastic place to live and work in. Because everyone’s experience is not mine, let me share some feedback on what I think is important about a career in the country.

It’s important to clarify that my target audience is people who have had at least three to four years of work experience outside China and are not of Chinese or oriental decent (which of course changes things a bit because issues of heritage and family come into play).

I believe one of the major success factors for my expatriate life in China is that I had already worked in a country (the Netherlands) other than my own for a significant period. OK, you might say, Amsterdam is a 50-minute flight from London whereas Beijing is about 8,000 kilometers away, but still it is a different culture; and I believe that truly understanding that we all see the world in a different way is something that only happens with time and experience.

I have seen many examples of expatriates in China landing in Beijing or Shanghai with the “I’ll get ‘them’ to do it our way (!)” mentality, and then slowly but surely their confidence wanes. Successful laowai realize that you will never change a culture thousands of years old, no matter how convincing you are. It is far better to understand and appreciate it.

The second, but perhaps most important tool for foreigners to do well in China is language. I can list at least 10 examples of people I know well who have enjoyed accelerated careers (in China) simply because they’ve made the effort to get to grips with Mandarin at a fluent or semi-fluent level. When I was at school in the 1980s and early 90s, there was tremendous emphasis on the European Initiative (basically, pupils from the age of 10 upwards were all taught German) which has since been quietly replaced with Mandarin.

Interestingly, learning English is also the most important advice I give to young Chinese people. I know many Chinese professionals who’ve done very well simply because they speak English fluently.

Staying with the practical and financial perspective for a second, the next most important element for foreigners – both early- and mid-career – is to be sent to China. Packages for the talented are still good and managers in disciplines such as finance, law and general management can expect tax equalization, paid apartments and schooling for children on top of hefty base salaries and bonuses (of course you have to perform, otherwise you’ll certainly be replaced).

I compare this with foreigners who move jobs within China who almost certainly will not get perks such as schooling and housing – and will probably be awarded a “local plus” package, or just a comparable package to a person from the local market.

Alongside expatriation, of course one has to understand that the expectations set at the beginning of an expatriate assignment in terms of timing have very little bearing on reality: three-year assignments quite often turn in to 10/15 plus year relocations. Why? Because for the vast majority of people working here, it takes at least two to three years to get used to life. At that point, most companies want to see a return on these investments so usually they prefer their managers to stay longer (if they’re good).

Finally, moving more toward the profound, one should consider such factors as: Are you genuinely interested in Chinese culture? Life is much easier if you are. Are you coming because you believe China is something of a magic cash machine? It isn’t. Are you prepared for the cultural differences? Read. Have you anticipated the problems? Ask.

There is a lot written about China, which is valid and useful, and equally a lot, which is based on prejudice, hearsay and speculation. Above all, do yourself a favor and come here for a week, there are thousands of travel options now, so come and explore, meet people and decide whether or not the challenge is for you, because above all else China is without doubt exactly that: a challenge.

The author is founder and managing director of RMG Selection, an Asia-focused human resources and recruitment consultancy.

Read the original version at: China Daily USA More information: RMG Selection

Making Sense of The Challenge

  EUROPE Understanding and appreciating finer cultural nuances can help expatriates succeed in China China is the world’s second-largest economy with growth that would leave many countries salivating. In my view China is a fantastic place to live and work in. Since everyone’s experience is not mine, let me share some feedback on what I think is important about a career in the country. It’s important to clarify that my target audience is people who have had at least three to four years of work experience outside China and are not of Chinese or oriental decent (which of course changes things a bit because issues of heritage and family come into play). I believe one of the major success factors for my expatriate life in China is that I had already worked in a country (the Netherlands) other than my own for a significant period. OK, you might say, Amsterdam is a 50-minute flight from London whereas Beijing is about 8,000 kilometers away, but still it is a different culture; and I believe that truly understanding that we all see the world in a different way is something that only happens with time and experience. I have seen many examples of expatriates in China landing in Beijing or Shanghai with the “I’ll get ‘them’ to do it our way (!)” mentality, and then slowly but surely their confidence wanes. Successful laowai realize that you will never change a culture thousands of years old, no matter how convincing you are. It is far better to understand and appreciate it. The second, but perhaps most important tool for foreigners to do well in China is language. I can list at least 10 examples of people I know well who have enjoyed accelerated careers (in China) simply because they’ve made the effort to get to grips with Mandarin at a fluent or semi-fluent level. When I was at school in the 1980s and early 90s, there was tremendous emphasis on the European Initiative (basically, pupils from the age of 10 upwards were all taught German); which has since been quietly replaced with Mandarin. Interestingly, learning English is also the most important advice I give to young Chinese people. I know many Chinese professionals who’ve done very well simply because they speak English fluently. Staying with the practical and financial perspective for a second, the next most important element for foreigners – both early and mid-career – is to be sent to China. Packages for the talented are still good, and managers in disciplines such as finance, law and general management can expect tax equalization, paid apartments, and schooling for children on top of hefty base salaries and bonuses (Of course you have to perform, otherwise you’ll certainly be replaced). I compare this with foreigners who move jobs within China who almost certainly will not get perks such as schooling and housing, and will probably be awarded a “local+” package, or just a comparable package to a person from the local market. Alongside expatriation, of course one has to understand that the expectations set at the beginning of an expatriate assignment in terms of timing have very little bearing on reality: three-year assignments quite often turn in to 10/15+ year relocations. Why? Because for the vast majority of people working here, it takes at least two to three years to get used to life, and at that point, most companies want to see a return on these investment so usually they prefer their managers to stay longer (if they’re good). Consider also that life in China offers a very high standard of living, buzz, excitement and rapid change when compared with the relative mundanity of cities, certainly in Western Europe. There aren’t many people I know who look forward to going home, and indeed, Westerners I know often retire to more developed Asian cities such as Hong Kong or Singapore. Finally, moving more toward the profound, one should consider such factors as: are you genuinely interested in Chinese culture? Life is much easier if you are. Are you coming because you believe China is something of a magic cash machine? It isn’t. Are you prepared for the cultural differences? Read. Have you anticipated the problems? Ask. These are all questions which need addressing, and will make whichever decision you eventually take far more concrete and assured. I’ve worked in China now for almost 10 years. I never expected to be here this long, but I love (nearly) every second and have made my life here. I would encourage anyone who’s intrigued to seriously explore a life in this gargantuan country, as there is no mistaking the significance of China in today’s world order, and for the right people there are some very serious opportunities here. There is a lot written about China, which is valid and useful, and equally a lot, which is based on prejudice, hearsay and speculation. Above all, do yourself a favor and come here for a week, there are thousands of travel options now, so come and explore, meet people and decide whether or not the challenge is for you, because above all else China is without doubt exactly that: a challenge. The author is founder and managing director of RMG Selection, an Asia-focused human resources and recruitment consultancy. Read the original version at: China Daily Europe  More information: RMG Selection

Something You Must Know about Layoffs in China

by Robert Parkinson, CEO and Founder of RMG Selection

After the ‘Gradual Model’ program of enhanced early retirement was put forward last year, IBM decided to reduce cost by laying people off. For cutting down USD 1 billion costs, IBM plans to get rid of 6000 to 8000 employees. Many companies consider layoffs as one of the most efficient methods to save themselves. However, have you considered the questions below before you did it? How will massive layoffs influence companies in both short and long-term, and how should a company handle the process to reduce the negative consequences to the lowest level? It is always a tough problem for HR departments. Therefore, a professional plan with logical steps and enough communication are necessary when you are going to let people go.

The first step of massive layoffs is to make sure you know the targets. Obviously, enterprises would like to cut down on employees who work ineffectively or have low KPI. Based on the Chinese law, however, employees cannot be fired under the following circumstances:
  • Employees who have occupational disease.
  • Female employees who are pregnant or in maternity leave.
  • People who are disabled from working for your company.
  • Employees who have worked in the company for more than 15 years and will retire in 5 years.
Quite a few enterprises do not actually really care about these rules and regulations, especially small and private companies. In this regard, it is necessary for employees to enhance their legal consciousness to protect their benefits. The first step to be discussed is whether it is proper to give the sack to employees who bear heavy economic pressure. Let’s say if the employer knows that there is an 8 year old little girl going to primary school in the family. Besides paying off the mortgages for the apartment, unfortunately the parents of the employee are sick in the hospital. Wouldn’t it be of mercilessness of the boss to fire this employee at the moment? I would say it is much easier to pull the trigger between the two parties during the tough period. In fact, these people normally have strong motivation to work hard for the company. And most importantly, they may show more eager reactions than others when they face the issue of being laid off. Therefore, if the company insists on dismissing this kind of employee, the result is usually a big loss for both sides. As for the company, bad influence will be exerted if the company is not able to handle the layoff well. One of the negative influences is that the company might lose the trust of its employees once they find out that their colleagues have been dismissed without reasonable payment. Therefore, it is not smart for companies to fire employees who are suffering from a lot economic pressures or encounter emergencies. If it has to be done, the way the company does it and the related social welfare and benefits package must be proper. The second step of the process is to inform employees who you have decided to lay off. This is a difficult step for most companies because it is a piece of bad news and no one feels good about telling it to employees. However, it is an essential aspect that lots of companies actually ignore. That will hurt your organisation very hard. Being honest with your staff is always a good way to build mutual understanding and trust. Announce the layoff news openly and clearly, but there is no need to publish the name list within the company. Next step, as the emotional factor is important, it is better to ask their direct manager to talk with employees closely, because this makes it easier to find out what they really care about after they leave the company. The announcement must be fair and clear. For instance, there is a company which decides to dismiss some of its employees. The management department issues an announcement which says that in order to take good care of employees the company has decided to provide more time to some employees in order to make sure that they have enough time to spend with their families. Obviously, it is an absolutely terrible excuse. If employees feel that the company is cheating or attempting to fool them, the layoff process will be very tough, and may even cause some conflicts. Actually, fairness and sincerity are basic factors when the management personnel are communicating with employees. If a company considers this problem from a long term perspective, it must show respect to its employees. In addition, HR needs to cooperate with the management department to deal with payment issues and aftercare work. As it is stated in Chinese law that companies need to pay extra salary to employees who are dismissed. The payment function is (n+1)*monthly salary. Employees’ working years equal to n, which means that the company needs to pay a monthly salary for each year the employee worked there. Besides, the monthly salary is the average level of the monthly salary during the past year. These are the basic conditions to layoffs. However, a lot of companies would like to pay more than the standard rates to their downsized workers to reward their contribution. For example, Siemens paid their employees a (n+3)*monthly salary in 2012, and Dell paid as (n+3)*monthly salary too during the layoffs in Xiamen in 2009. The fact shows that added payment is helpful for companies to go through layoffs process smoothly. Furthermore, career guidance is also useful for employees who have just lost jobs. Compared to the payment, most staff members care greatly about what they will do in the future. In this regard, employees will be grateful if the company  provides career guidance for them. In 2009, Hitachi cut down a number of employees. Most of them were worried about their future career. However, through the discussion of their management department, they decided to try their best to recommend these employees to others companies. In this way, instead of getting too many complaints, Hitachi’s employees felt very grateful for the careful consideration. It is a striking example to prove that layoffs can be managed in a peaceful and effective way. However, if your company really cannot afford higher payment and career guidance, a recommendation that explains the reason clearly would also be helpful. 02(81) In addition, psychologists are playing a more and more important role in a company, especially in the laying off process. Because of the high pressure in modern society, someone may be stressed out if he or she is dismissed. In this case, a psychologist is very necessary. The psychologist can talk with employees about their work burdens, what they worry about and what they care about most. Subsequently he can report these problems to the management department who should think carefully about how to solve these problems in a proper way. Actually, some companies tend to use a third-party HR team help them to dismiss employees. Companies who choose this method avoid facing their employees directly. Ho wever, how can a company expect a third party HR team to take all the responsibility? If the leaving employee feels unsatisfied about the process, they will not complain to the HR team, but to the company itself. Organisations cannot push all responsibilities away by hiring third-party HR teams to help them with layoffs.
Many people see layoffs as a terrible experience, but it can bring benefits for companies if you treat it in right way. Actually, layoffs usually happen in times of economic crisis. Instead of only seeing the negative effects, it can be seen as an opportunity to enhance the company’s brand. It is a good time to demonstrate welfare, care and a sense of responsibility from your company. As we know, economic crises do not occur all of the time, so the benefits will return to companies and employees sooner or later.
Read the original article at : Business Tianjin Magazine 

How much is an MBA Worth asks Robert Parkinson, CEO of RMG International Business Consulting (Beijing) Co., Ltd

 gr

‘The ticket to executive positions with a six digit salary’ has long been the tag on the MBA degree. MBA degrees contain a kind of magic that inspires a soaring expectation from the candidates. According to Poets and Quants collection of salary expectation of MBA candidates cross different countries, the US MBAs expect a 140 per cent raise for their MBA degree, a 148 per cent salary increase is expected from UK MBAs and a whopping 245 per cent salary raise is expected from Chinese MBA candidates. However, according to the talent flow survey conducted by RMG Selection in China, the average salary raise from job-hopping is 20 to 30 per cent, regardless the position level or the qualification of the job seekers. As unrealistic these expectations are, these rate rises do not come from nowhere.

The great story and the not so great reality

For years there has been a love story between the Wall Street Firms and the top MBA programmes graduates, making the MBA the ticket to investment banking and other top finance sectors. MBA candidates are immersed in misleading reports and stories that make them believe in the magic of MBA degree automatically getting them leadership positions.

However, even the love affair between Wall Street and Harvard MBAs didn’t survive the big financial meltdown of 2008. According to Poets and Quants, only 27 per cent of Harvard MBAs have been recruited into financial sectors this year, down from 35 per cent last year and 39 per cent in 2011. Also Bloomberg reported a continuous two year decline of MBA recruitment in all business schools with a recruitment rate of 70 per cent, down from 75 per cent last year. The hard reality also plays out for Chinese MBAs. Because of the bad employment conditions of China this year, 25 per cent of MBAs postponed their graduation – as reported by Hexun news. If that wasn’t bad enough, the private sector in China claimed that they were not recruiting MBAs because of the high hiring cost.

Facing the not so great reality, it is important for MBA candidates to sort their priorities of what is important in a job instead of relying on the authority of the degree or those outdated stories. Candidates also need to remember that the cost of gaining an MBA exceeds the amount required for fees. Actual cost is significantly higher since it includes cost of living expenses, foregone salary and other opportunity costs such as a perspective promotion. And even having paid that cost a candidate’s return on investment is far from certain time-wise. According to the China Talent Flow Survey of 2013 by RMG Selection, the response rate of online resume application of MBAs does not show any radical difference from that of experienced bachelors over a six month period. The brand equity added simply from the privilege of an MBA degree is therefore not as dramatic as candidates imagine. Put simply, MBAs are not rewarded more money because of their degree.

Recruiters: the Checklist for hiring an MBA

Facing such high salary anticipations of MBA talents, it is very important that recruiting companies make meticulous hiring decisions between an MBA and an experienced professional and have a clear and specific recruitment need. The following are a checklist recommended to HR facing MBA recruitment:

1: Does this position really need MBA credential?

An MBA is not the must for every higher position. Most consultancies prefer their candidates to have an MBA because the jobs require critical management and leadership skill. Also the networks created from the MBA programs could benefit the company in the terms of Business Development. Also for above director level position, an MBA candidate is recommended because the executive management plays a crucial role for these positions. On the other hand for more technical and specialized positions, such as a Head Engineer or the R&D manager, it is the expertise in the specific field that is most valuable. The MBA credential does not differentiate one candidate from another.

2: What type of MBA program is candidate enrolled in?

Most hiring managers or HRs focuses on the school where the MBA degree is issued. Recruiters are likely to neglect the type of MBA program the candidate participates. Most candidates will not list the type of MBA program they are enrolled in on the resume unless it is a full time MBA program. Therefore, additional questions need to be asked even if the candidates graduated with a Harvard MBA.

Typically, there are three types of MBAs:

• The two year full time MBA

• Part time MBA

• Online MBA

Most universities have the first two programs but some community college or specialised MBA education institution offers the MBA courses online. The MBA experience varies through different type of programs candidates are enrolled in. The full time MBA engage candidates to study, practice and networking with their classmates and annulus. Due to less time commitment, the part time MBA may not guarantee the engagement in the course learning but the daily work practice is also likely to lift the practical benefits that candidates get from the courses. It is also worth mentioning that there are different variations in MBA programs, such as International MBA, Overseas MBA and EMBA, which all have different focuses in terms of function, industry and courses.

3: Can the MBA education add practical value to the candidate and the company?

MBA degree on the resume should only boost their chances to get interviewed but not their chances to get hired. One of the most valued benefits from MBA education is the range and quality of network MBAs are likely to have after your graduation, especially if they are graduating from one of the top programs. However, the networks will lose its value when the candidate does not have enough networking and relationship management skills. It is important to learn about how the candidates practice what they have learned from the courses or cases into real business practices before you made the decisions to pass all the other candidates.

4: Can you afford an MBA?

From a financial perspective, though MBAs expectation to have a more than 140 per cent salary raise is not realistic, recruiters do need to understand and manage MBA graduates’ expectations. It is crucial for recruiters to set up clear and firm offer ceiling, the highest or the most costly offer package that the company can afford, during the salary negotiation because it is very likely for recruiters to end up with a higher planned salary for an MBA than a normal experienced professional.

From a management perspective, although recruiters are most likely to hire an MBA for a managerial position, the team dynamic should also be taken into consideration. There is a risk to hire a manager rather than internal promotion due to the possible disruption of the team effectiveness. If the MBA is not the right leader for the team, there are possibilities to lose one of the former employee or the MBA talent after all and affect the efficiency of the whole department.

5: Make your retention plan effective.

No company wants a quick turnover of their management team. Therefore, if you have MBA candidates entered your final round of interviews, it is important to make the retention plan before you make the actual hiring decisions because it is very likely that you are going to employ an MBA. Besides the salary raise and a good title, MBA candidates also have high expectation of their career development. A detailed career development plan not only increase the chance of the candidates accept the offer but also controls your internal position turnover and human resource planning, especially when you have decided to hire an MBA.

Also, after you have hired an MBA manager, certain support is needed in order to make the transition. For instance, it is recommended to arrange a senior manager to mentor the MBA to fit in the team dynamic and coordinate the subordinates as well.

 Read the original version at: http://www.theglobalrecruiter.com/news/how-much-is-an-mba-worth-asks-robert-parkinson-ceo-of-rmg-international-business-consulting-beijing-co-ltd/4616

Archives